Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Water for Elephants (2011)


I haven't read the book, so I can't compare this film to it, I can only compare the film to other circus films / love stories. Robert Pattinson is Jacob, wait isn't that the name of one of the characters from those other movies? Reese Witherspoon is Marlena the horse/elephant performer. There's a lot of smiling, and I guess if I was as pretty as either one of them, I'd smile a lot too. Add Cristoph Waltz in as August and you've got quite a main cast.
Considering that two of the three are Academy Award (r) you would think this movie would be amazing. It's not bad, but it's not amazing. The pacing of the film is a tad slow, though it does start to pick up at an hour or so into the film, but that is sooooo long to wait for things to pick up.
The vast portion of this film takes place in 1931, and everything seems to be very accurate. The costumery is top notch, as is the portrayal of depression era United States. But what really steals the show, is Rosie the elephant, played by Tai (hey, I'm giving everyone else their creds). She steals every scene she is in, but animals, especially those that are smart and well-trained, are well known for upstaging their human counterparts.
I wasn't around when prohibition was going on, but I was always under the impression that people did not flaunt their alcohol, they just drank in private, or if the movies are any indication, in speak-easies. This film has lots of booze. It seems to me that if you're going to fill a film with lots of booze and keep mentioning the prohibition that it should be key to the plot - cops busting you, or the friendly towny helping out with a warning, and then bam! In run the cops yelling it's a raid, just so that we can finally get the kiss we've been waiting for the last 78 minutes.
And then the movie goes on in slow motion with triumphant scenes of Witherspoon performing with the elephant as sad music plays to Pattinson looking on. Meanwhile Waltz is getting more and more jealous and a little crazy with what he imagines, and in no small part insures will happen.
But, at least Rosie is still in the movie. Right? As the movie finally builds to it's awkward climax, you finally get the idea that if the movie is like the book, that you're glad that you've watched the movie. Maybe I'm not a romantic (I guess there is more than one person that could confirm this for you if you need it confirmed) but I don't think this book would have done anything more than put me to sleep. Maybe the book was full of all kinds of delicious details like the wonderful "Night Circus" by Erin Morgenstern. And maybe the book wasn't as formulaic as the film, I know that making a movie can often shape stories into something unrecognizable.
The finale of the movie makes up for the previous slowness, but leaves me wondering why they didn't have better pacing all along - I don't mean non-stop action, but non-stop movement of the story or non-stop character development, or preferably all of the above.
Oh, and I'm sure that Pattinson is happy to know that when he grows up and then old, he will be Hal Holbrook. There are far worse ways to turn out.

Water for Elephants at IMDb

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Balada Triste de Trompeta - The Last Circus (2010)


Oh...my...fucking...god!
Thee is some seriously fucked up shit going on this film. I couldn't look away, like I was watching some horrible slow motion clown train wreck.
The protagonist and antagonist become so alike by the end, in fact I would say that the protagonist has become the antagonist if not his own antagonist. And the girl, oh the girl. As she is told, she wants her cake and to eat it too. And in the end, she does what she is good at and the clown is a laughing clown and the clown is a sad clown.
I don't know enough about the political climate of Spain in the 1970s to know if what we were shown was an accurate portrayal, certainly not the events, but perhaps the feel. I would like to think that Franco had his hand severely bit by a man forced to behave as a dog, before he became a crazy mother fucker on his way to being the sad clown.
Carlos Areces as Javier was an excellent choice, as was Antonio de la Torre as Sergio, they weren't just actors playing the roles, they were Javier and Sergio. Carolina Bang as Natalya was a little off her game the first half of the film I thought, but the second half I think I realized that being a little off was what Natalya was - beautiful, but in her own way as crazy as her clowns.
The final, climactic scene is painful on so many levels. Even though the clowns are now fully monsters, you still feel empathy towards them. But you really feel for Natalya. She seems so trapped in her choices and you can't tell if she really is trapped to the limited number of possibilities or if she is only convinced that her options are so limited.

Balada Triste de Trompeta at IMDb

Monday, October 29, 2012

Casshern (2004)


Imagine if you will, a world in which there is only war. A world where the men in power enjoy a certain lifestyle, one of luxury and relative peace, but for everyone else, it is the direst of times. Add the aesthetics of a Japanese version of Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. For the story, use the age old avenging son plot, with equal parts Frankenstein and Akira rolled in to it, and you have Casshern.
In the context of this story, Casshern is the angel of peace, a deity of love and harmony. The character of the same name everntually becomes the deity and decides that the only way for there to be peace is to kill them all. I don't just mean the bad guys, I mean everyone, until just he and his wife are left. But don't worry, the spirits of the dead form a laser that shoots across the galaxy to smack into some planet, a ball of rock really, which it terraforms into paradise.
Yeah, I don't get it either.

Casshern at IMDb

Saturday, October 27, 2012

The Grey


Oh my god, I was not prepared for this movie. I had seen a trailer with a plane crashing and Liam Neeson with a rifle and lots of snow. Based on this information and the title, I concocted some theory about this film being a spy thriller with the title being some reference to a moral grey zone. Boy, was I off the mark. But, I did know that before I hit play, since I had described the above to the librarian when I was checking this out, and all she would say was, "she couldn't say" and that it was a very exciting film. She was right, for sure.
This film is gritty and depressing both on a personal and on an existential level. But, it accomplished this brilliantly. It really is such a simple story, quite elegant really. It is man versus nature (I can get away with saying this because there are only male characters involved in the main story) and man versus himself as he copes with the first conflict. Rounded out with realistic dialog and reactions to the situations that present themselves, this film doesn't try to get fancy or be anything it's not.
Normally, I try to stay away from the real depressing films, but this is an exception. The reality of the situation is so closely paired with hope for the future that you can make it through this film. Even more rare than watching said films is my recommending them, but I strongly recommend this one. Sure, I'll watch anything with Mr. Neeson in it, but this one is a good one. This is one of the better films I've seen in a while.

The Grey on IMDb

Friday, October 26, 2012

Preparation for NaNoWriMo


This time next Thursday I will be very tired. I will have either stayed up all night to start writing at midnight, or I will have taken a short nap before doing so. I may or may not take a nap after the first push, but the second push will definitely begin at 6 a.m. sharp as I brew that first cup of tea of the day.
I've spent the last week going over notes and filling in blank spots as I find them. As I am working on a sequel this time out, I do have a certain advantage as I have seen most of the characters in action already, though I am adding several new characters, at least one of whom will get to narrate chapters. I've been working on character portraits for them so I will have as strong a base as possible to start from.
I have an outline for the first quarter to third of the story. Again, this almost seems too easy because I'm writing a sequel. I know how this story begins and how this story ends. I just have to hope that my characters are going to take from point A to point B, and that any detours we take along the way are just that, detours and not changes of course. But if I get off track, well maybe instead of a trilogy it will be a quadrology.
There are two particular things I'm doing in preparation this year, one I've done for a couple of years and the other for the first time. First, what I've done before: I don't create a soundtrack for my story, but I create a soundtrack for my writing. It's more about the musical ambiance than about the words, because I'm really using this soundtrack to create a moodscape. The way I do it, which I am by no means insinuating is the only way or even a good way, is to find an artist or several artists that has a sound the either represents the narrator or would be their favorite music in the whole world. I try to get at least three hours worth per narrator and not more than say 12 hours worth because you start getting away from that core sound. I expect I'll be using between five and nine narrators, so I've got plenty of work putting together playlists. Personally, once the playlist is created I like to set it on random. When I know an album, I find myself taking a little break to wait for a favorite song to start and sometimes the little break becomes much bigger. That is not bad in general, but for NaNoWriMo, it might be the difference of 500 words or more across a days writing which equates to 15,000 or more across the month - and that is a lot of words.
I typically use music I am familiar with for my moodscapes. That can mean a favorite album I've played hundreds of times (well at least certain songs from the album) or it can mean something I've just checked out from the library and listened to one time to make sure it is what I want. For example, two years ago I was working on a science fiction story where it was popular in the culture to be nostalgic for your family's historical homeland. I checked out CDs of folk music for China and India, of which there were very few choices through out library system, but the ones I found were exactly what I was looking for. I had a much harder time finding traditional music from Brazil and eventually found some through youtube, which I could not listen to when I was writing because I do not have an internet connection where I live, but none the less they were a good resource for flavor for the character.
I would be remiss if I didn't mention that on almost all the days, I couldn't have told you more than two or three songs that I listened to. Once I get into the flow of writing, I concentrate hard enough on what I am doing that I miss the sounds entirely - at least consciously. Subconsciously is a different story and why I cannot listen to my beloved NPR while writing. Words from the radio pop up in the story. Usually they have nothing to do with the story and sometimes can be quite funny on the re-read. I never catch them while writing, it's always at the end of the day or the start of the next day when I am reading over what I have just written that I notice them.
The new thing I am doing in preparation this year supplements my outline and character portraits. I am writing character arcs. A character arc is like a story arc, except it's specific for a given character and contains emotional and psychological changes/transformations as well as the physical events that will happen to the character. I plan on writing a story with more than a dozen named, recurring characters. It is very easy to forget where you were going with a character if you haven't written them in a week or two, a week or two where you have been intensely focused on other characters. I think there will be an additional benefit to doing this along the same lines when it comes around to rewriting for the second draft. It certainly can't hurt. In fact, I'm going to retro-create character arcs for the first book in the series.
There is one final thing I'm doing in preparation. I know I said two things to prepare for writing, but this is preparation for when I'm not writing when I feel like I should be writing. I'm gathering together writer's block breakers (WBB). My main WBB are magazines, especially National Geographic. Can't write? Or get stuck in a spot? Take a break to read a magazine. I choose National Geographic, because my reading might be as quick as just glancing at the pictures, of which every single issue I've ever seen is full of just amazing photography, or I might be need a bigger distraction in which case I'll take the time to read one oor more articles. I also like Popular Science and Popular Mechanics for the same reason. But I also have a few New Yorkers, Smithsonians and Scientific Americans mixed into my pile of several hundred. That's right, several hundred because my library sells old issues and issues donated to the library for ten cents each. I prefer the actual physical magazine for a couple of reasons - it's not my computer, and if I have writer's block stepping away from the computer is more helpful than just changing windows; if I see a particularly motivational image, I can tear it out and post it on the wall. If you've only spent ten cents instead of the full price for a magazine, you do not feel in the least bit guilty tearing it up.
Another WBB I have gathered, that I often couple with eating my meals, are episodes of sitcoms or comedies. I find the half hour variety is better, because when you're watching them on DVD they're only 22 minutes. Again, it's the library to the rescue. I live in a small town that is part of a small county cooperative and we have lots to choose from. It doesn't really matter if you have seen them before or not. These WBBs are to take your mind off what you are doing for a short while, which is why I prefer comedies. I suppose if I were writing a humorous novel, I might choose serious shows, but you get the idea.
The last thing I have to add is kind of preparatory, but mostly just something to think about. I think most of us interested writing a novel are apt readers of novels. And just because we're spending all of our free time writing doesn't mean that we have to give up reading. But, I feel that if I'm writing a novel, it is not in my best interest to be reading a novel. I don't want to subconsciously influence my own story or style by reading a particular book. Though there are many books who I would be proud to write in the style of, I want to do it through practice and conscious thought. The solution, I think, is to find a good non-fiction book or two, of the non-narrative kind. Though you might feel different, and I can imagine reading a biography of a famous person, for example, might be beneficial if you are writing about that person or the time they lived in. I've got Elephants on Acid and other Bizarre Experiments by Alex Boese and A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson. Both books can be read five minutes at a time if you so choose, or in chapter lengths. I am already reading the former and am both freaked out and intrigued by it, but mostly entertained. The latter book I haven't started, but recently finished another Bryson history book At Home: a Short History of Private Life, which was amazingly interesting and random enough to keep me hooked the whole book. I also recommend any of Sarah Vowell's books. Educational and funny, which is a winning combo when you need to take a break from writing to get some reading done.